Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:11

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Jesse Armstrong’s HBO Movie ‘Mountainhead’ Gets Early Release On Max - Deadline
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Amazon joins the big nuclear party, buying 1.92 GW for AWS - TechCrunch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How do scammers communicate? Do they have a specific language or slang?
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Vandenberg’s Next Mission: SpaceX Rocket Launch on Sunday - Noozhawk
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Fans Furious After Caitlin Clark Announcement Before Paige Bueckers Matchup - Athlon Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trevor Penning: The things I do well fit better at guard - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
PSG vs. Inter Miami: What will decide Club World Cup knockout game? - MLSsoccer.com